M&A activity creates two simultaneous advisory entry points — and TV Ad Intelligence & Measurement Platform needed both at once. When a company is acquiring and being scrutinized simultaneously, the same trigger (M&A) creates demand for two distinct services: (1) technical due diligence on the target they're evaluating, and (2) resilience documentation uplift on their own environment to satisfy buyer-side and audit scrutiny. We responded to both in the same engagement window — two proposals, 3 days apart, totaling ~$130K in advisory work.
The M&A DD framework — covering Data Architecture, Performance Benchmarking, Data Governance, and Cloud Platform Engineering — is a reusable pattern. Any company evaluating a data-heavy acquisition target (SaaS, adtech, fintech, edtech) needs exactly this four-domain technical assessment to make a Go/No-Go call. The ClickHouse deep-dive is also a strong differentiator: very few advisory firms have specific ClickHouse competency, and TV Ad Intelligence & Measurement Platform's acquisition target used it as a primary analytical store.
Use this engagement when selling to: Fast-growing SaaS, adtech, fintech, or media-tech companies in active M&A cycles. Also strong for any buyer-side deal advisory conversation where the question is "can we trust the data architecture of what we're acquiring?" The BCP/DR pattern fits any company preparing for audit, regulatory review, or acquirer due diligence scrutiny of their own environment.
M&A Due Diligence Problem
- Evaluating a potential acquisition target with a complex data architecture — ClickHouse-based analytical store, ETL pipelines, hybrid AWS environment
- Need for independent technical assessment to validate "does what the target says it does" — architecture diagrams vs. actual implementation
- Performance benchmarking needed to compare target's data throughput against TV Ad Intelligence & Measurement Platform's own environment as a like-for-like baseline
- Data governance gaps in the target could represent post-acquisition cost, compliance, or integration risk — needed systematic assessment pre-deal
- AWS environment of the target needed Well-Architected review to surface right-sizing opportunities and post-acquisition cloud cost exposure
BCP/DR Documentation Problem
- BCP/DR documentation at "MVP level" — technically sufficient for minimum regulatory requirements but not for M&A buyer scrutiny
- Increased M&A activity bringing more frequent, deeper buyer-side technical diligence including BCP/DR posture review
- Internal audit cycles and regulatory reviews independently flagging documentation gaps
- Infrastructure scope and interconnectivity growing faster than documentation — technical debt in resilience planning
- MySQL → Aurora migration needed to complete the resilience uplift — 13TB in-region migration with ETL complexity
| Engagement | Team Roles | Duration | Fee |
|---|---|---|---|
| M&A Technology Due Diligence | Engagement Manager, Data Architect, Sr. M&A Advisory Consultant, Cloud Architect | 2–3 Weeks | ~$60,000 |
| BCP/DR Planning Accelerator (incl. MySQL→Aurora 13TB migration) | Engagement Manager ($230/hr × 70h), Solution Architect ($255/hr × 160h), Data Engineer ($55/hr × 240h) | 5 Weeks | $70,100 |
| Combined Proposed Value | ~$130,100 | ||